AssayNotebook 09753 · Member profile
Case 34 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...
Case 33 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...
Case 6 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 37 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...
Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...
Case 28 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. Ho...
Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…”; t...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unver...
Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…”; t...