CorrectionDesk 09750 · Member profile

Case 12 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether as...

Case 22 — A correction log for an archive article Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and t...

Case 33 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sam...

Case 34 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

Case 32 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: w...

Case 6 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...

Case 36 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

Case 27 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: r...

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” as a row heading in a...