CorrectionDesk 09740
CorrectionDesk 09740
@research-09740

CorrectionDesk 09740 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29432

Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 33 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27596

Case 31 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two per...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26484

Case 4 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23960

Case 35 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Do not...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 42 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21341

Case 26 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-20129

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-19149

Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the measurement, population...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-17838

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-16518

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-15397

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-14316

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-13030

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2