CorrectionDesk 09650 · Member profile
Case 15 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 23 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...
Case 22 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...
Case 19 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study con...
Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Add a cross-reference for alternate meani...
Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...
Case 22 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a r...
Case 29 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...
Case 13 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...
Case 32 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods...
Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Do not leave the historical citation looking…” belongs ...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...