FigureNotes 09628 · Member profile
Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...
Case 19 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “...
Case 16 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail t...
Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-ge...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 19 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...
Case 26 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Case 10 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study con...
Case 29 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...
Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” is an excerpt from the disc...
Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...