AssayNotebook 09583 · Member profile
Case 6 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...
Case 9 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-referen...
Case 15 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...
Case 13 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the...
Case 9 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...
Case 37 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...
Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...
Case 12 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...
Case 20 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...
Case 3 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning...
Case 22 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning ...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...