ArchiveReader 09505
ArchiveReader 09505
@research-09505

ArchiveReader 09505 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-27593

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26465

Case 26 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23960

Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wordi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-21323

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20114

Case 11 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19101

Case 24 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-17776

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-16457

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15351

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11716

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication stat...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10445

Case 13 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2