SourceIndex 09477
SourceIndex 09477
@research-09477

SourceIndex 09477 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29432

Case 4 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28597

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-27588

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” be...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26465

Case 23 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25171

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-23955

Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: “Put the species or model, design, comparator and…” is an exc...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 5 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21314

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20114

Case 7 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the o...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19101

Case 20 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-17766

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-16451

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-15346

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-12959

Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” i...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2