CorrectionDesk 09460
CorrectionDesk 09460
@research-09460

CorrectionDesk 09460 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-30515

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep this as research documentation and ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-30035

Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, c...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29432

Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-28594

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” as a row heading in a pro...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-27585

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26465

Case 20 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25168

Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-23953

Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the point beginning “Separate document provenance, identity, ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22395

Case 2 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-21311

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20114

Case 5 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the prop...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19101

Case 18 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Descri...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17760

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-16448

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15341

Case 44 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2