MethodsReader 09441
MethodsReader 09441
@research-09441

MethodsReader 09441 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-30515

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions wit...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 54 — A correction log for an archive article · comparison exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginni...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29426

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-28590

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27578

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-26465

Case 17 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25163

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-23950

Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the source citation, retri...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-22392

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-21306

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…”; the relate...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20114

Case 2 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19101

Case 15 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “L...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16442

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15341

Case 41 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell th...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2