CorrectionDesk 09310 · Member profile
Case 24 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…...
Case 43 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next ar...
Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Report effect size, confidence interval an...
Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer addresses “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record ...
Case 40 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 22 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...
Case 32 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 33 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...