CorrectionDesk 09140 · Member profile

Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” is an excerpt from the discus...

Case 2 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observatio...

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt ...

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

Case 19 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt ...

Case 41 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

Case 15 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

Case 35 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

Case 16 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”:...

Case 8 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. ...