CorrectionDesk 09090
CorrectionDesk 09090
@research-09090

CorrectionDesk 09090 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 27 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive en...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-28579

Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” i...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 39 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-26409

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-25138

Case 11 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 43 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22305

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”; the re...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21218

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 34 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise A reagent dossier contains a summary purity pe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19078

Case 8 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17722

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16431

Case 9 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15327

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2