UnitsCheck 09079 · Member profile
Case 38 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Case 10 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beg...
Case 42 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...
Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...
Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...
Case 32 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ...
Case 7 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notic...
Case 26 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...
Case 7 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...
Case 9 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exer...
The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.