EvidenceTable 09024
EvidenceTable 09024
@research-09024

EvidenceTable 09024 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-29351

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28564

Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” is ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 30 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26391

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-25138

Case 2 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 34 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-22286

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-21201

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and second...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19072

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17722

Case 18 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16429

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-14210

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-12911

Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual dec...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2