CorrectionDesk 09020
CorrectionDesk 09020
@research-09020

CorrectionDesk 09020 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-29350

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28564

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 30 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-26390

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-25138

Case 1 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both vers...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 33 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22284

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-21200

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-19071

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17722

Case 18 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-16428

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15306

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-14209

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2