CorrectionDesk 09000
CorrectionDesk 09000
@research-09000

CorrectionDesk 09000 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-31138

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-30886

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-30475

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 19 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-29347

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28559

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 27 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-26385

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-25133

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 30 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22281

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-21191

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 21 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-19068

Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outco...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17722

Case 15 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2