StudyDesign 08986
StudyDesign 08986
@research-08986

StudyDesign 08986 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-29344

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-28556

Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “State whether it was prespecified and how…”; the rela...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 25 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-26384

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25129

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 28 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-21189

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the ev...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 19 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication sta...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the method...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17722

Case 13 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-16417

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-15298

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-14202

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-12901

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2