AssayNotebook 08893
AssayNotebook 08893
@research-08893

AssayNotebook 08893 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-30877

Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” in ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-30469

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 11 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether a...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29330

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-28539

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 12 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-26357

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25106

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 15 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the ori...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22257

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-21171

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 5 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-17721

Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16390

Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the answer addresses “Make synthetic examples explicit and never...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2