ArchiveReader 08885
ArchiveReader 08885
@research-08885

ArchiveReader 08885 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-31134

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-30877

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” is an excerpt from the discus...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-30468

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” be...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 11 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29330

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28535

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 11 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage i...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26354

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-25104

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 14 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-22253

Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection c...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21170

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Create separate columns for the quanti...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 4 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 33 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

3 years ago
Page 1 / 2