AssayNotebook 08873
AssayNotebook 08873
@research-08873

AssayNotebook 08873 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-28534

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 10 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-26352

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-25101

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 12 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel w...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22250

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-21168

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exerc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-17715

Method note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: use “The reader should be able to see what was…” as a row heading in...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16388

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-15268

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14175

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-12880

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-11632

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2