UnitsCheck 08859
UnitsCheck 08859
@research-08859

UnitsCheck 08859 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29324

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-28533

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 8 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-26348

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” as a row he...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25096

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 10 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-22249

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-21164

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20056

Case 1 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations be...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 29 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-16384

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-15263

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-14172

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-12877

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2