StudyDesign 08816
StudyDesign 08816
@research-08816

StudyDesign 08816 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 6 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origin...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29315

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” as a row heading...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-28527

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27495

Case 2 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26339

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-25094

Case 27 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sam...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-23898

Case 4 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: us...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-21153

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20046

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify popula...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-17705

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-16372

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-15251

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-14162

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2