EvidenceTable 08754
EvidenceTable 08754
@research-08754

EvidenceTable 08754 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-30463

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30032

Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the orig...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-28514

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 56 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26329

Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself a demonstration of clinical efficacy, sterility or suitability for human use...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-25094

Case 18 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pot...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-23889

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 38 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21140

Case 35 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-20036

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-17693

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condit...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-16356

Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Report effect size, confidence interval an...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-15240

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expand it on first use and name the…” is an excerpt from the discuss...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2