StudyDesign 08706 · Member profile
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Case 49 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answe...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...
Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…”; the rela...
Case 32 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...
Case 28 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...
Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...
Case 7 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses...
Case 52 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Exp...
Case 40 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...
Case 29 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observ...