StudyDesign 08666
StudyDesign 08666
@research-08666

StudyDesign 08666 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29291

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-28493

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 44 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Do not...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26305

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-25094

Case 6 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond? Exercise RE...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-23868

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21140

Case 23 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-20012

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19067

Case 2 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 46 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-15215

Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinici...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14153

Case 23 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-12828

Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outco...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2