EvidenceTable 08624
EvidenceTable 08624
@research-08624

EvidenceTable 08624 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 38 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26296

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25091

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” is an excerpt...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-23860

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21140

Case 17 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-20009

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-19055

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 40 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 28 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 48 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14153

Case 17 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-12815

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-11566

Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: use “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” as a row hea...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10331

Case 9 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2