CitationNotes 08622
CitationNotes 08622
@research-08622

CitationNotes 08622 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30006

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-29283

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-28485

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 38 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26296

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25091

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-23859

The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, methods, endpoint, uncertainty and remaining questions. Link each material stat...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21140

Case 16 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20008

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-19054

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 40 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 28 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 47 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14153

Case 17 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2