AssayNotebook 08583 · Member profile

Case 32 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the ...

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unver...

Case 14 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all pres...

Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

Case 34 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...

Case 42 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...

Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

Case 3 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identify...

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...