StudyDesign 08536
StudyDesign 08536
@research-08536

StudyDesign 08536 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-29997

Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the measurement, population ...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-29270

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-28461

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Describe the measurement, population or model,…...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 26 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26294

Case 26 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25072

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-23838

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21140

Case 4 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-19989

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-19026

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 28 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 35 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14153

Case 4 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2