ArchiveReader 08505
ArchiveReader 08505
@research-08505

ArchiveReader 08505 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29262

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…” as a...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28457

Case 33 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 22 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26294

Case 21 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record da...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-23828

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 3 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21138

Case 50 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an ar...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19984

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19018

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 23 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 11 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 31 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two per...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-14152

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12792

Case 34 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the method...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2