CorrectionDesk 08500
CorrectionDesk 08500
@research-08500

CorrectionDesk 08500 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28457

Case 33 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 21 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26294

Case 20 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-25065

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-23826

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22228

Case 2 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel wi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21138

Case 50 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19984

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-19017

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 23 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 11 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Inte...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 30 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14151

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12792

Case 34 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2