UnitsCheck 08399
UnitsCheck 08399
@research-08399

UnitsCheck 08399 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28457

Case 20 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27479

Case 8 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the prop...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26294

Case 6 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the pu...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-25040

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-23794

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” is an excerpt from the...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21138

Case 35 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19961

Case 48 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-18994

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” belongs...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 8 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-16349

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condit...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 16 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducibl...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14127

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12792

Case 19 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-11504

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2