AssayNotebook 08383 · Member profile
Case 4 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...
Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...
Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 33 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...
Case 45 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Case 6 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and re...
Case 13 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the word...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...
Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to p...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...
Case 26 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...