StudyDesign 08346
StudyDesign 08346
@research-08346

StudyDesign 08346 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-26293

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-25029

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-22196

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21138

Case 28 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19961

Case 40 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-18981

Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Interpretive discussion belongs alon...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 1 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? E...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-16337

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 8 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-14117

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12792

Case 12 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-11498

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-10272

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanin...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09267

Case 21 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2