CorrectionDesk 08280
CorrectionDesk 08280
@research-08280

CorrectionDesk 08280 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-30442

Case 27 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29963

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29254

Case 34 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28457

Case 5 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-27469

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…”; the related ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26281

Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: retain the wording beginning “A percentage without its meth...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25011

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-23762

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22187

Case 40 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21138

Case 18 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19961

Case 31 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-17663

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-16320

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15210

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2