StudyDesign 08166
StudyDesign 08166
@research-08166

StudyDesign 08166 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-28440

Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Expand it on first use and name the…” fro...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-27452

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26258

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-24986

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-23729

Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…”;...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22187

Case 24 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21138

Case 2 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the pu...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19961

Case 14 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18943

Case 30 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17640

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16294

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15189

Case 47 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14114

Case 12 — A correction log for an archive article Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the orig...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12774

Case 51 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · comparison exercise Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison erro...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-11462

Case 37 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2