StudyDesign 08146
StudyDesign 08146
@research-08146

StudyDesign 08146 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-31115

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30832

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-30442

Case 20 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29958

Case 28 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29254

Case 19 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Dis...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-28437

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-27449

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-23728

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22187

Case 21 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potent...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21135

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19961

Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18943

Case 27 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-17636

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2