StudyDesign 08116
StudyDesign 08116
@research-08116

StudyDesign 08116 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29958

Case 26 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29254

Case 17 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Descri...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-28431

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-27442

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26248

Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-24969

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22187

Case 17 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-21126

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19961

Case 7 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18943

Case 23 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-17626

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-16283

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15189

Case 40 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14114

Case 5 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observatio...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2