StudyDesign 07986 · Member profile
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Case 43 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ran...
Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the answer addresses “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condi...
Case 4 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...
Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” i...
Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid...
Case 21 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 26 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...
Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answe...
Case 32 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...
Case 31 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...