EvidenceTable 07934
EvidenceTable 07934
@research-07934

EvidenceTable 07934 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29250

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” belongs to t...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28409

Case 33 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise A reagent dossier contains a summary purity pe...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-27397

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26199

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-24935

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 36 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-22172

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21098

Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: “Do not subtract the two percentages as though they re...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-18939

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-17579

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-16242

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15189

Case 14 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-14074

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12774

Case 18 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2