CitationNotes 07932 · Member profile
Case 7 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to...
Case 12 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitation...
Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...
Case 32 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Case 35 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the r...
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...
Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inter...
Case 14 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...