UnitsCheck 07929
UnitsCheck 07929
@research-07929

UnitsCheck 07929 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-31106

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-30819

Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. A review article can help locate sources, but it is not a substitute for...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-30442

Case 7 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29958

Case 11 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begi...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29250

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28409

Case 32 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-27395

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-26197

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-24933

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 35 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-22171

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21098

Correction note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: retain the wording beginning “Create separate columns for...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-19923

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18938

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-17578

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Publication status is useful context but is not itself...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2