AssayNotebook 07923
AssayNotebook 07923
@research-07923

AssayNotebook 07923 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-31106

Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: distinguish the discussion point “Create separate columns fo...

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-30819

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-30442

Case 6 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary so...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29958

Case 11 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-29249

Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reporte...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28409

Case 31 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ret...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-27394

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26195

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-24932

Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating r...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-22169

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21098

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-19921

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-17578

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” f...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2