MethodsReader 07881
MethodsReader 07881
@research-07881

MethodsReader 07881 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-27382

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26185

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-24925

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 28 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”:...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-22163

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-21089

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19912

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Such material can suggest questions but…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-18928

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-17567

Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” i...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-16230

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15189

Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14072

Case 31 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12774

Case 11 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-11454

Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “State the study design and what was...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10203

Case 17 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2