CorrectionDesk 07840
CorrectionDesk 07840
@research-07840

CorrectionDesk 07840 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-27375

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-26173

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-24920

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the word...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-22150

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21086

Case 25 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-19903

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18914

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-17553

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16224

Case 36 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14072

Case 26 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12774

Case 5 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-11445

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10203

Case 12 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outcome. What qualification is ...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2