MethodsReader 07731
MethodsReader 07731
@research-07731

MethodsReader 07731 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-27360

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-26143

Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…”; t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-24890

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 7 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22126

Case 38 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21086

Case 10 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-19874

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18903

Case 45 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-17522

Correction note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: retain the wording beginning “Create separate columns for...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16224

Case 21 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat expl...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15162

Case 30 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14072

Case 10 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all pres...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-11420

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-10196

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2