StudyDesign 07696
StudyDesign 07696
@research-07696

StudyDesign 07696 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29224

Case 23 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species,...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28409

Case 1 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-27349

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-26138

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-24880

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Such material can suggest questions but…” belongs to the ques...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-23699

Case 2 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22126

Case 33 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21086

Case 5 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-19868

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18903

Case 40 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-17515

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16224

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15162

Case 25 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14072

Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report ef...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-12748

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2