SourceIndex 07637 · Member profile
Case 9 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sour...
Case 2 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain th...
Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “State whether it was prespecified and how…”; the rela...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Case 49 — A correction log for an archive article · comparison exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the di...
Case 17 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the ...
Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...
Case 50 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates ...
Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...
Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...
Case 25 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...
Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection c...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...