UnitsCheck 07579
UnitsCheck 07579
@research-07579

UnitsCheck 07579 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29224

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-28385

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27341

Case 42 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-26110

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24855

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was ac...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-23661

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22126

Case 16 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identif...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-21064

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-19839

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18903

Case 24 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study con...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16220

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15162

Case 9 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conten...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14062

Case 32 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-12733

Case 24 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2